<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ParentsOutloud &#187; Parents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/category/parents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com</link>
	<description>Helping provide a voice for Parents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:34:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Named and shamed&#8230; the phonics refuseniks</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/named-ane-shamed-the-phonics-refuseniks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/named-ane-shamed-the-phonics-refuseniks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have fought for &#8220;phonics&#8221; for 40 years but I was appalled at the UNSYSTEMATIC &#8220;Letters and Sounds&#8221; thrust on teachers in 2007.  It claims to be systematic but it is   phonics put through the shredder, with no acknowledgement of &#8220;the grtain of the language&#8221; until  the END, jsut a few hints.  It is ENcoding based on 44 sounds. And this mess cost us £2.46.
Far better is DEcoding phonics based on 26 letters and how they interact consistently, and this would have cost £5,  ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have fought for &#8220;phonics&#8221; for 40 years but I was appalled at the UNSYSTEMATIC &#8220;Letters and Sounds&#8221; thrust on teachers in 2007.  It claims to be systematic but it is   phonics put through the shredder, with no acknowledgement of &#8220;the grtain of the language&#8221; until  the END, jsut a few hints.  It is ENcoding based on 44 sounds. And this mess cost us £2.46.<br />
Far better is DEcoding phonics based on 26 letters and how they interact consistently, and this would have cost £5,  or now FREE at www.phonics4free.org.<br />
If teachers had been directed to DEcodijg phonics, instead of refuseniks we would have heard, &#8220;Why didn&#8217;t they tell us this in our training?&#8221;  and PERHAPS the real culprits would have been named and shamed &#8211; the &#8220;professionals&#8221;.<br />
A failure of 1 in 4 for 50 years is only possible under government. Can you imagine Ford or Rolls Royce manufacturing cars from a design that makes 1 in 4 undrivable?<br />
But the Dept for Education say they will no longer reply to my emails. You can&#8217;t tell &#8216;em.  And we pay their salaries, £77.7bn a year at the end of Blair&#8217;s term.<br />
How bad does it have to get before students rebel during their mistraining?  How long befoe the thousands of poor adult readers finally get together and run a class action against the universities and Dept for Education?</p>
<p>Literacy should be a good 20 points higher than today&#8217;s national averae.  Do the guilty hide this by saaying it is too good to be true? Or do they just say &#8220;We are the professionals&#8221; and that ends all discussion?<br />
Once you UNDERSTAND (which takes perhaps an hour, no more),  you have to wonder how the silly ideas ever got accepted by, I suppose,  intelligent?   professionals!<br />
Until the teachers wake up, it is up to parents to teach their child to read before he starts school, from www.phonics4free.org  which IS          DEcoding phonics!  Teachers  please note.<br />
 Name and email supplied</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/named-ane-shamed-the-phonics-refuseniks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you feel about the teachers going on strike?</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/how-do-you-feel-about-the-teachers-going-on-strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/how-do-you-feel-about-the-teachers-going-on-strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sarah EbnerNovember 29 2011 schoolgate Times
Oh dear. It&#8217;s strike day and I&#8217;d like to be sympathetic to the teachers. I really would.
But the reality is that I feel rather conflicted. We live in very difficult times. True, they are not caused by teachers, but neither are they caused by me, or many other private sector workers. Everyone is feeling the pinch. Everyone is going to have to retire later than they expected. And some of us don&#8217;t have any pensions at all.
I do value teachers, but I&#8217;m not really sure ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/strike.jpg"><img src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/strike-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="strike" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2455" /></a>Sarah EbnerNovember 29 2011 schoolgate Times<br />
Oh dear. It&#8217;s strike day and I&#8217;d like to be sympathetic to the teachers. I really would.<br />
But the reality is that I feel rather conflicted. We live in very difficult times. True, they are not caused by teachers, but neither are they caused by me, or many other private sector workers. Everyone is feeling the pinch. Everyone is going to have to retire later than they expected. And some of us don&#8217;t have any pensions at all.<br />
I do value teachers, but I&#8217;m not really sure what they think this strike will achieve, nor what they are actually going to be doing on the big day (there doesn&#8217;t seem to be a big rally, like the one in June). I am aware that many people who don&#8217;t normally strike (headteachers, different unions) are taking action, and that this has become something that is about something more than pensions.<br />
I also know that I&#8217;m not alone in finding the issue difficult. Many parents are angry about having to take time off work themselves to look after their children tomorrow. Many are having to pay for extra childcare. Not many appear to be taking their children to work with them (despite the Prime Minister&#8217;s advice).</p>
<p>Margaret Morrissey from ParentsOutLoud had this to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If I take my child off school I am in danger of having to pay a fine but teachers can close a school down for their own needs&#8230;. What an example to set, what a sad day it will be, Never never complain to a parent if they take their child out of school for a day saying &#8220;it is irresponsible and affecting their education&#8221;. You obviously do not believe that or you would not be striking.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/how-do-you-feel-about-the-teachers-going-on-strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transgender lessons for pupils aged five</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/transgender-lessons-for-pupils-aged-five/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/transgender-lessons-for-pupils-aged-five/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ministers warn a wide range of steps are needed to combat ‘transphobic bullying’, which is defined as
the taunting of children who express ‘gender variant behaviours’.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/blackboard.jpg"><img src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/blackboard-256x300.jpg" alt="blackboard" title="blackboard" width="256" height="300" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2426" /></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;"><strong>Jack Doyle Daily Mail</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Ministers warn a wide range of steps are needed to combat ‘transphobic bullying’, which is defined as<br />
the taunting of children who express ‘gender variant behaviours’. The document<br />
was produced by the Home Office, which is responsible for equality policy<br />
within Government.It states that schools need to be ‘more inclusive for<br />
gender-variant children’.‘We know that over 70 per cent of boys and girls who<br />
express gender variant behaviours are subject to bullying in schools,’ the<br />
document states. in. ‘Tackling<br />
transphobic bullying helps to address unacceptable behaviour and ensures that<br />
our society becomes more tolerant.’ As part of its review of PSHE, the<br />
Department for Education will consider adding ‘the teaching of equality and<br />
diversity, including transgender equality’ to the curriculum.But critics said<br />
there was a danger that children were being overloaded with ‘adult issues’ as a<br />
result of such lessons.</p>
<blockquote><p>Margaret Morrissey, founder of<br />
campaign group Parents Outloud, said: ‘These are adult issues and we should<br />
leave it until children are older or until they ask. ‘The problem is we are<br />
overloading our children with issues that they should not have to consider at a<br />
young age. PSHE is already overloaded with other issues. ‘We have given them<br />
sex education and teenage pregnancies have risen year on year. ‘We have told<br />
children about drugs education and we have a serious problem with drugs. We<br />
have told them about drinking and cigarettes and we have more children with<br />
alcohol problems and smoking.’</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Transgender people include<br />
those who have had sex change operations and people who have both male and<br />
female sexual organs. Other measures proposed as part of the equality drive<br />
include help for transgender job seekers and rules for the NHS designed to<br />
ensure transgender people are dealt with fairly. The move comes after a<br />
Government survey found nearly nine out of ten transgender employees suffered<br />
discrimination or harassment at work. Also announced yesterday were longer jail<br />
terms for murderers who are motivated by hatred of transgender people.The basic<br />
sentence for anyone convicted of such killings will be 30 years, Kenneth Clarke<br />
said. Similar attacks on disabled people will also face the same tough minimum<br />
term. The Justice Secretary said that offenders ‘should be in no doubt that<br />
they face a more severe sentence for these unacceptable crimes’. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071915/Transgender-lessons-pupils-aged-Classes-overload-children-adult-issues-say-critics.html" title="Click here to see Daily Mail article" target="_blank">Click here to see Daily Mail article</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/transgender-lessons-for-pupils-aged-five/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My teacher hates me!’</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/my-teacher-hates-me%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/my-teacher-hates-me%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are some things you never want to hear your child say, and when it comes to his education, “Mummy, my teacher doesn’t
like me!” tops the list. So what can you do ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/teacher-hates-me.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2398" title="teacher hates me" src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/teacher-hates-me-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>There are some things you never want to hear your child say, and when it comes to his education, “Mummy, my teacher doesn’t<br />
like me!” tops the list. So what can you do if your child insists the teacher thinks they’re bottom of the class? Sarah Ebner offers some advice.</p>
<p><a href="http://resources.theschoolrun.com/offers/testimonial_mmb.html">Join TheSchoolRun now</a> to instantly download<br />
100s of educational worksheets, past SATs papers, essential learning packs plus<br />
much more – all for just £1.97.</p>
<p><strong>Your child-teacher conflict action plan</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Start by<br />
finding out more</strong> about why your child believes there is such a problem with their teacher. Don’t panic – it’s vital that you<br />
stay calm in order to try to help. You can’t just go rushing to school making accusations; you need to be properly prepared.</li>
<li><strong>Give yourself<br />
time to chat through the problem with your child</strong>, and ask specific questions about what has happened and when. This will<br />
help reveal how serious the problem is, or if your child is overstating the facts a little (for example, they might not actually like the teacher, but that doesn’t mean they’re being treated badly). This is also important because, if something really serious is going on, you will need to arm yourself with proper evidence before you speak to the school.</li>
<li>Personality clashes can, and do, happen in the classroom, and they can prove to be particularly tricky in primary school because children have just one (or sometimes two) teachers eachyear. If the situation sounds salvageable, <strong>speak to the teacher about it first</strong>. Make sure you’re tactful, as Margaret Morrisey from <a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/" target="_blank">parentsoutloud</a>.com  recommends. “Suggest to the teacher that your child is struggling to form a relationship with them. Ask if they could try to keep an eye on what’s going on and for suggestions on how best to workit out. Don’t infer that it’s the teacher’s fault or accuse them; their defence will be that you don’t know what the child is like in the classroom. You need<br />
to be polite, but also to get to the bottom of it. You could always suggest meeting again in a few weeks to see how things have improved.”</li>
<li>If the situation is seriously affecting your child and you don’t think it would help to speak to the teacher, <strong>make an appointment to see the headteacher</strong> and make sure you bring your evidence to the meeting. The head’s responsibility is to work with your child<br />
and the teacher to sort out the problem if at all possible. Sometimes the whole thing is a misunderstanding, and the teacher is horrified when it is mentioned. Unfortunately, at other times, this is not the case. The headteacher can address this through discussions with the teacher, as well as lesson observations.</li>
<li>If your school is a two-form entry school, you could <strong>ask for your child to switch classes</strong>. Leaving the school altogether is not a brilliant solution as it could look like “running away”. Do try to see if the situation could be resolved in other ways.</li>
<li><strong>Approach the<br />
school governors</strong> only if you feel there is nothing more the headteacher can do (or if you think they haven’t done enough).<br />
Contacting Ofsted is a much more serious last resort.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Uncover the real problem</strong></p>
<p>Don’t forget to consider that sometimes children use the “my teacher hates me” line to cover up other challenges they’re facing. Yes, it could be a personality clash or a genuine example of bad teaching, but it could also be that your child is struggling in school or behaving badly. In other words, ask yourself some honest questions about your child’s school experience, and consider if there are any other issues (friendships, for example) which might be the real cause of their unhappiness.</p>
<p><em>Join our forum discussion about <a href="http://www.theschoolrun.com/forum/does-your-child-school">whether children like or dislike going to school</a>,<br />
and find out <a href="http://www.theschoolrun.com/what-do-when-your-child-hates-school">what to do when your child hates school</a>.</em></p>
<p><strong>Sarah Ebner is the author of <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Starting-School-Survival-Guide-everything/dp/1905410875/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1309448102&amp;sr=1-1" target="_blank"><em>The Starting School Survival<br />
Guide: everything you need to know when your child starts school</em></a>,<br />
published by White Ladder and also available on Kindle.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/my-teacher-hates-me%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wednesday strike action</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wednesday-strike-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wednesday-strike-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I started my work as a parents champion during the 1980's teachers strike when asking a question on David Jacobs any Questions programme discussing the damaged caused to children's learning. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I started my work as a parents champion during the 1980&#8242;s teachers strike when asking a question on David Jacobs any Questions programme discussing the damaged caused to children&#8217;s learning.  This strike is far the worse than the 80&#8242;s</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Head teachers are at the top of the pay scale so I accept have more to lose but they  can afford the extra pension. If I take my child off school I am in danger of having to pay a fine but teachers can close a school down for their own needs. Not onlywill the strike action stop children&#8217;s learning it will damage their moral outlook. The message is if I cannot have what I want I will stop work and cause harm to children at a time many of their parents have lost their jobs and pensions with no chance of recovery for some months/years. We are in deep financial trouble nationally from the last government and failures in Europe again with weak and inadequate governments. So when your country is on its knees kick hard hold allthe people to ransom and think only of how we can line our own pockets .  What an example to set what a sad day it will be and to think men ,women,  boys have given their life for this nation,   sorry teachers who strike we expected better from you , you who lead our children you make no one feel proud and many feel ashamed. N ever never complain to a parent if they take their child out of school for a day saying  it is irresponsible and effecting  their education , you obviously do not believe that or you would not be striking.</p>
<p><strong>To the thousands of teachers who are working and not striking thank you so much</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wednesday-strike-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scrap reading tests for pupils aged 6, experts urge ministers</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/scrap-reading-tests-for-pupils-aged-6-experts-urge-ministers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/scrap-reading-tests-for-pupils-aged-6-experts-urge-ministers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 19:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading literacy experts will utrge the Government to abandon plans for a compulsory national reading test for all six-year-olds next summer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Children_reading_1940.jpg"><img src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Children_reading_1940-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="Children_reading_1940" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2355" /></a><br />
Richard Garner  independent<br />
Friday 28 October 2011 </p>
<p>Leading literacy experts will utrge the Government to abandon plans for a compulsory national reading test for all six-year-olds next summer.<br />
Ministers argue the assessment, which will see pupils reading real and made-up words to test their phonics skills, will help identify slow readers. However, the experts say a pilot of the test ended up baffling the brightest youngsters and warn it could even end up lowering reading standards.<br />
In a letter to the Education Secretary Michael Gove, they and teachers&#8217; leaders – who include Professor Robin Alexander, the Cambridge don who three years ago headed the most thorough investigation into primary schooling in the past 40 years – say the Government has misinterpreted the findings of a pilot of the test.<br />
The Schools minister Nick Gibb argued that &#8220;the check will be of real benefit to pupils but takes just a few minutes to carry out and is a positive experience for most children&#8221;.<br />
However, the letter says 72 per cent of schools found difficulties with the use of &#8220;pseudo words&#8221;, which led to some of their most able readers becoming confused. The trial assessment included 20 real words and 20 made-up ones.<br />
The signatories say the findings confirm their worries that the test &#8220;could actually harm standards in the longer term with able readers mistakenly identified as needing further teaching of phonics and being held back as a result&#8221;.<br />
They also take issue with Mr Gibbs&#8217; claim that the evaluation takes &#8220;just a few minutes&#8221;. They say the average time teachers devoted to it in the pilot was 15.5 hours. They urge ministers to reconsider the introduction of the test. &#8220;The signatories of this letter would welcome an opportunity to discuss how teacher assessment of reading would identify and help young readers who are slow to start,&#8221; they add.<br />
It is signed by Professor Alexander; David Reedy, chairman of the UK Literacy Association; and John Hickman, chairman of the National Association of Advisers for English. Fellow signatories include several teachers&#8217; leaders.<br />
A spokeswoman for the Department for Education accused the authors of the letter of misreading &#8220;much of the evidence&#8221; from the pilot tests. She added: &#8220;Only last month we learned that one in 10 boys can read no better than a seven-year-old at the end of Key Stage 2 (11-year-olds). We cannot let this continue.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/scrap-reading-tests-for-pupils-aged-6-experts-urge-ministers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BOYS’ ‘SEX ATTACK’ ON MY GIRL, 8</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/boys%e2%80%99-%e2%80%98sexattack%e2%80%99-on-my-girl-8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/boys%e2%80%99-%e2%80%98sexattack%e2%80%99-on-my-girl-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Report by
Tim Paget    Chad
e-mail tim.paget@chad.co.uk
Mum’s anger at school punishment after incident
A Mansfield Mum.who says her eight-year old daughter was ‘sexually assaulted’ at school has criticised the punishment handed out to the two boys responsible.
The girl was allegedly pinned up against a wall and kicked while the pair of boys,
who are also aged eight and in the same class, carried out the attack .Her 24-year-old mother said the schoolgirl was left upset and frightened by the incident, which took place earlier this week And she says the two ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roc-harry.jpg"><img src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/roc-harry-111x150.jpg" alt="" title="roc harry" width="111" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2339" /></a><br />
Report by<br />
Tim Paget    Chad<br />
e-mail tim.paget@chad.co.uk</p>
<p>Mum’s anger at school punishment after incident<br />
A Mansfield Mum.who says her eight-year old daughter was ‘sexually assaulted’ at school has criticised the punishment handed out to the two boys responsible.<br />
The girl was allegedly pinned up against a wall and kicked while the pair of boys,<br />
who are also aged eight and in the same class, carried out the attack .Her 24-year-old mother said the schoolgirl was left upset and frightened by the incident, which took place earlier this week And she says the two boys should be suspended for a lengthy period of time or even excluded from school. “I was shocked when I fi rst found out,” she said .“But now I feel angry because of the way it has been handled. I do not want my daughter anywhere near the boys and I don’t think other parents would want their kids near them either.” The girl’s mother, who Chad cannot name for legal reasons, says the incident happened when her daughter went to the toilet during afternoon break. She claims they waited for her outside and then pinned her against the wall. “Both had hold of her and would not let her go,” she said. “She approached the playground teacher but it was the end of break so was not able to say what happened.” The girl then told her grandma when she got home and later informed her mother what had happened. “The next day I was very angry<br />
because of the way the head teacher spoke to me and the punishment<br />
which has been given to the boys,” she added. According to the mum, they have<br />
both been told to write a letter saying ‘sorry’ and one of the boys has been told to stay off school for two days. “I think it is pathetic,” the girl’s mum said. “They should be excluded from school or at the very least suspended for a couple of weeks so<br />
they know the seriousness of what they have done. “It should be made clear it is wrong and not acceptable behaviour.” </p>
<blockquote><p>Parentsoutloud, a group set up in 2008 to  give parents a voice in education, says the boys and the girl involved should be kept at home until a full investigation has been held. </p></blockquote>
<p>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Margaret Morrissey, founder of Parentsoutloud.com, said: “By the very nature of the way this is being dealt with, it says to an outsider there would seem to be things not being revealed about the children involved.” </p></blockquote>
<p>John Peck, a former head teacher at a Mansfield Woodhouse primary school, said cases of this type involving young children were very<br />
rare. Sometimes young children do things which are of a sexual nature without fully understanding what they are doing,” added Mr Peck, a spokesman for the National Association of Head Teachers. “It could be just children being children or it could be something in the background of the particular child which you don’t know about.<br />
“I am sure the head teacher has investigated it fully and taken the appropriate action. It is very much a matter of judgement for the individual head teacher as it is very<br />
difficult to set guidelines because every case is different. “If the parent is not satisfied they should ask about the complaints procedure which every school has .”Chad is not able to name the school, but the social care department at Nottinghamshire County Council has been informed. Steve Edwards, service director for social care, said: “We always take allegations of this type of behaviour seriously. For reasons of confidentiality it would be inappropriate for us to comment further at this time.”<br />
A spokesman for Nottinghamshire Police said yesterday that no incident had been reported and officers were not investigating as the individuals concerned were below the age of criminal responsibility.</p>
<p>http://www.chad.co.uk/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/boys%e2%80%99-%e2%80%98sexattack%e2%80%99-on-my-girl-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do you agree</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/do-you-agree/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/do-you-agree/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Parents,
How long does it take for a vital national profession to accept that it is continuing in an error that is has damaged, and is continuing to damage, millions of lives?  History provides some examples. Here is one in medicine.
Until the middle of the 19th century, ‘childbed fever’ was killing up to one third of mothers and their babies. Royal mothers were not immune.The following account of happened next can be found in Wikipedia:In the early 1800s a Hungarian doctor called Semmelweis discovered that washing hands with antiseptic ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Parents,<br />
How long does it take for a vital national profession to accept that it is continuing in an error that is has damaged, and is continuing to damage, millions of lives?  History provides some examples. Here is one in medicine.<br />
Until the middle of the 19th century, ‘childbed fever’ was killing up to one third of mothers and their babies. Royal mothers were not immune.The following account of happened next can be found in Wikipedia:In the early 1800s a Hungarian doctor called Semmelweis discovered that washing hands with antiseptic reduced fatalities by 90%. This conflicted with medical concepts and the image that doctors had of themselves. Their ridicule was so extreme that Semmelweis was eventually committed to a mental asylum, where he died. The article continues: “The resistance of today&#8217;s doctors to concepts like evidence based medicine has caused some speculation that the actual problem originates in the ego focus that prevails in the culture of doctoring.”I am not going to accuse your GP of having an ego problem. I will accuse the entire British education system of an ego problem: also the education systems of the United States and those of most other countries in Europe.But let us first consider our own problem:Every major British university has a department of education. For decades their professors have been researching how to improve British standards of education.or decades British standards of education have been falling.Almost a third of their students teachers decide, after all, not to teach.Of those who qualify, almost half quit within five years.<br />
Half the teachers currently in British schools wish they could find other work. This is just an outline of our problem.Your children’s future will not improve without a collective effort to tell individual teachers how to correct their mistake in time. This is achievable. This is doable.Let me introduce myself.For twenty-five years I was a head of mathematics at one of Britain’s most academically successful international school. This was the first official British European Schools. Funded by our government and the European Union, it was one of twelve similar schools throughout Europe. Teaching mathematics to pupils from 10 to 18, preparing my senior pupils for their Baccalaureate, I was working entirely outside the British curriculum. Because mine, like that of all my European colleagues, was effectively a political appointment, even if my School’s directors disagreed with what I was doing, it would have been very difficult for them to have me removed For a long time, there was nothing for them to disagree about My senior pupils were soon achieving amongst the highest average Baccalaureates marks of all twelve schools. They continued to achieve these for the whole of my twenty-five years. None of my senior pupils ever failed.<br />
But, after six years in this very prestigious, highly-paid position, I was also becoming so dissatisfied that I was ready to quit. This would have been painful. I had no other qualification. I had a family to support. I decided instead to try to find an entirely different way to teach. I wanted more than my pupils’ high level of exam success. I wanted to engage their real interest. I wanted them to learn a true understanding of what they were doing. I wanted them to learn how to learn: so that university would a new delight. Above all, I wanted to rise above the petty squabbles of the classroom. I wanted them to be happy. Such absurd ambitions! There were two reasons why I was so dissatisfied with myself. The first was that although my senior pupils were achieving these high marks, I knew that very few really understood what they doing. They were achieving these marks because I am extremely good instructor. The second was that there were some amongst my younger pupils who hated me intensely.I did not know why.<br />
I had stumbled on education’s nasty, ancient, ruinous little secret. Please do not blame any other British teacher for not doing what I did next. It would be nearly impossible. They cannot change until the government and their school directors, whilst taking full responsibility, tell them they can. But ParentsOutLoud can begin.<br />
All your children need to do is to begin ask their teachers, not maliciously, and only from time to time: “When can we ask questions?”Do not expect the walls of Jericho to begin to tumble all at once: but this may allow some teachers to join you. They will know as well as any that if British schools do not improve very soon, your children’s future is not encouraging. It is not looking good right now.First the nasty secret.<br />
When I left the Army, in 1975, I was aged 32. I applied to train to teach at one of Britain’s most prestigious schools of education.  Most amongst my year group, were Cambridge graduates. Our lecturers played on the vanity of us all by encouraging us to believe that we would become such competent, charismatic, inventive teachers. Effortless controlling the learning of our classes, year after year commanding the full attention of our pupils, they would eventually leave for their university full of gratitude for our ability and care. And, for a time, this really appeared to happen.I had been an instructor in Army. I am actually a very good instructor. Being ten years older than most other students, I suppose I had a fraction more authority. The government selected me from my first teaching post to this far more prestigious position at the British European School. My new colleagues were amongst the best qualified and experienced in Europe.The first few years I enjoyed enormously. Eventually, however, I began to realise that although my Baccalaureate pupils were achieving very good marks, I knew &#8211; and sometimes I knew that they knew – that few of them really understood what they doing. They were all passing with their high marks because I am extremely good instructor. My image of myself as a wonderfully competent, charismatic, inventive communicator of knowledge was a fraud. It almost never is real. This was disturbing. But this was also true, I realised, for my colleagues.The reason for it is that for over eighty years the education establishments of most Western countries have been refusing to correct an appallingly expensive and hugely damaging mistake. It is not a complicated mistake. In fact it is so obvious, that it astonishing that it was ever taken seriously. But vanity is a terrible lure. So too is ambition.In 1926 a young but well-placed Swiss psychologist, Dr Jean Piaget, electrified European educationalists by announcing that he had discovered that all children of about the same age have about the same degree of the same kind of intelligence: and that there is only this one kind of intelligence.<br />
This was electrifying not only because it would appeared to allow children to be much more completely understood, therefore far easier to teach, but because it opened university doors  to a new science of education, a science that could be based upon Dr Piaget’s wonderful discovery. One could become a scientific professor of education. And do research.Every parent knows that children are different. Every sibling knows. It is obvious in any play-ground. Children are all very different. The claim that they are not can only be imagined by those who have forgotten their childhood, or have never played or never worked with children, or who want to believe that they are as similar as laboratory rats. This belief became fashionable too. In the United States, especially, the theory of ‘radical behaviourism’ was highly influential. It ‘refused to accept that private events, such as thinking, perceptions, and unobservable emotions, are necessary in any causal account of an organism&#8217;s behaviour’.   Replace ‘organism’ by child: and weep.And yet despite its obvious falsity, Piaget’s discovery is still supported. It is still the basis of most children’s education. Think what this means. Most children want to be in a class with others of their own age. There is no obvious harm in this. Schools create classes of thirty or more youngsters, all about the same age.<br />
Disastrous is what happens next. Because all children of approximately the same age are believed to have the same degree of the same kind of intelligence, it must obviously be possible for any truly competent teacher to address them all as if &#8211; effectively &#8211; they are just one brain. But they are not, And this is very largely why our schools are failing.Youngsters of about the same age have very different kinds of intelligence. They cannot all learn as if they are just one brain. In 1983 a Harvard psychologist called Dr Howard Gardner declared that he found children to possess up to seven kinds of intelligence, every one in different degrees, all developing at different rates. Dr Gardner, rather like poor Semmelweis, is still being attacked by some of his colleagues: for not being ‘scientific enough’. I tried for many years to teach my pupils according to Dr Piaget’s understanding of children’s intelligence. At first it seemed that I was succeeding. But I was also becoming aware that this kind of instruction, by anyone, will soon divides a class into three distinct divisions. The first division contains the few pupils who really can comprehend. Disliked by the others, they learn to be selfish.<br />
The second, usually the majority, learn to obey and to conceal how little they actually understand. They will begin believe that all success requires a degree of dishonesty. The third division came to school expecting to be helped. Puzzled and frustrated, they become angry. They will become our underclass. They will always feel cheated.<br />
This is why our societies are divided. There may be other reasons why our schools are failing. First is the fact that instruction not only does not work. It also does lasting damage.There is a way to give children’s different kinds of intelligence, developing at different rates in children of the same age, the opportunities they need in one classroom.It is more easily achieved in mathematics than in any other subject. It can also be achieved at home.<br />
The reason is that almost all mathematics can be understood as argument. Directing youngsters to argue their way to a shared understanding of mathematics engages, simultaneously, all their various kinds of intelligence.  .<br />
On the way they will also learn to participate in receptive, critical, constructive discourse. The divisions described above do not appear. The result is happiness.The ideas that they can argue about may be presented to them by their teacher: “Is one and one always two?” Or they can found in any well-structured textbook.<br />
The teacher asks a pupil to read aloud a single sentence from their textbook. Then the reader, or another, is asked to explain what this sentence means. Not whether they understand it: but what does it mean, in their own words.<br />
This is not only a great help in improving the literacy and the confidence of all the pupils, it also accustoms the older pupils to work alone from their books. This is what they need at university.Complex knowledge consists of associations. Sitting silently listening to a teacher, however knowledgeable and talented, creates far too few associations. Reading aloud to others; listening to others; discussing meaning; searching better explanations; giving examples; explaining to others: all use far more energy; involve many more functions of the brain, create many more associations. It is essential that your or their teacher shows no surprise when the first reply to: “What do you think that means?” is an anguished or surly: “I don’t know.”  This is natural. Their teacher should simply ask the same person, or another: “Please read that line again.”  The most fruitful consequence is that this enlists children’s natural competitiveness. When engaged together in attempting to understand the meaning of a text, pupils will compete to achieve the best explanation for others. The others then decide whose attempt to reward. It is not common for mathematics lessons to be joyful. . Soon students also begin to realise that they can direct their own learning. Without losing any of their friends &#8211; indeed, taking friends with them &#8211; they can become autonomous, capable of excelling independent of any teacher.I am writing to Parentsoutloud because a few months ago I attended the final reunion of pupils and staff at the school where I taught for a quarter-century, where some of my ex-pupils urged me to open a Facebook group to tell me people about the way that I learnt, in their classrooms, to teach them.<br />
The Facebook group is called: ‘Children for an honest, just and fairer world’.  Dozens of new members are joining every week. They are encouraging their friends to join. Our current aim is to have 10,000 by Christmas.<br />
You will also notice that we have also a very large number of Arabic members who also hope to achieve a more honest, just and fairer world. Thanks to the Internet our message is spreading. Yesterday I was interviewed in the centre of Oxford by Iraqi TV. This must be a first!I hope that many of you will join us: and then write to Mr Gove to tell him why!<br />
Thank you.<br />
Colin Hannaford.<br />
	Oxford. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/do-you-agree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dress witches in pink and avoid white paper to prevent racism in nuseries, expert says</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Julie Henry, Education Correspondent Sunday Telegraph
Wizard of Oz, 1939 Photo: REX FEATURES
Teachers should censor the toy box to replace witches&#8217; black hats with a pink ones and dress fairies in darker shades, according to a consultant who has issued advice to local authorities.From the Wicked Witch of the West in the Wizard of Oz to Meg, the good witch from the Meg and Mog children&#8217;s books, witches have always dressed in black.
But their traditional attire has now come in for criticism from equality experts who claim it could send ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By Julie Henry, Education Correspondent Sunday Telegraph</p>
<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/wiz-oz.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2315" title="390932id" src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/wiz-oz-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Wizard of Oz, 1939 Photo: REX FEATURES<br />
Teachers should censor the toy box to replace witches&#8217; black hats with a pink ones and dress fairies in darker shades, according to a consultant who has issued advice to local authorities.From the Wicked Witch of the West in the Wizard of Oz to Meg, the good witch from the Meg and Mog children&#8217;s books, witches have always dressed in black.<br />
But their traditional attire has now come in for criticism from equality experts who claim it could send a negative message to toddlers in nursery and lead to racism.<br />
Instead, teachers should censor the toy box and replace the pointy black hat with a pink one, while dressing fairies, generally resplendent in pale pastels, in darker shades. Another staple of the classroom &#8211; white paper &#8211; has also been questioned by Anne O&#8217;Connor, an early years consultant who advises local authorities on equality and diversity. Children should be provided with paper other than white to drawn on and paints and crayons should come in &#8220;the full range of flesh tones&#8221;, reflecting the diversity of the human race, according to the former teacher.<br />
Finally, staff should be prepared to be economical with the truth when asked by pupils what their favourite colour is and, in the interests of good race relations, answer &#8220;black&#8221; or &#8220;brown&#8221;.<br />
The measures, outlined in a series of guides in Nursery World magazine, are aimed at avoiding racial bias in toddlers as young as two. According to the guides, very young children may begin to express negative and discriminatory views about skin colour and appearance that nursery staff must help them &#8220;unlearn&#8221;.<br />
If children develop positive associations with dark colours, the greater the likelihood that the attitude will be generalised to people, it says. The advice is based on an “anti-bias” approach to education which developed in the United States as part of multiculturalism. It challenges prejudices such as racism, sexism and ageism through the whole curriculum and teaches children about tolerance and respect and to critically analyse what they are taught and think. Ms O’Connor, who has worked with Newham and Tower Hamlets local authorities and recently devised equality material for Lancashire council’s Sure Start, early years and childcare service, said the approach developed children’s empathy and helped early years teachers to explore their own conditioning and possible prejudices.<br />
“This is an incredibly complex subject that can easily become simplified and inaccurately portrayed. There is a tendency in education to say &#8216;here are normal people and here are different people and we have to be kind to those different people’, whether it’s race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, age or faith.<br />
“What we hope to do is help practitioners put themselves in the shoes of the child or the parents who is considered different. What we want for future generations is a sense of self that does not deny everyone else’s sense of self.<br />
She added that helping to develop empathy in children should be central to the curriculum and not an add on or tick box exercise.“People who are feeling defensive can say &#8216;well there’s nothing wrong with white paper’, but in reality there could be if you don’t see yourself reflected in the things around you,” she said.<br />
“As an early years teacher, the minute you start thinking, &#8216;well actually, if I give everyone green paper, what happens’, you have a teaching potential.<br />
“People might criticise this as political correctness gone mad. But it is because of political correctness we have moved on enormously. If you think that we now take it for granted that our buildings and public highways are adapted so people in wheelchairs and with pushchairs can move around. Years ago if you were in a wheelchair, then tough luck. We have completely moved and we wouldn’t have done that without the equality movement.”</p>
<blockquote><p>Margaret Morrissey, a spokeswoman for the Parents Outloud campaigning group disagrees. She said: “I’m sure these early years experts know their field but they seem to be obsessed about colour and determined to make everyone else obsessed about it too. “Not allowing toy witches to wear black seems to me nonsense and in the same vein as those people who have a problem with &#8216;Bar Bar Black Sheep’ or &#8216;The Three Little Pigs’.<br />
Children just see a sheep in a field, whether it be black, grey, white or beige. I have worked with children for 41 years and I don’t believe I have ever met a two year old who was in any way racist or prejudice.”</p></blockquote>
<p>However, recent research by Professor Lord Winston provides evidence that children as young as four can hold racist views. In an experiment carried out for the BBC’s Child of our Time series, children were presented with a series of images of faces of men, women, boys or girls. Only one of the faces in each sequence was white.<br />
Children were asked to pick out the face of the person they wanted as their friend and the person they thought would be most likely to get in to trouble.<br />
Almost all white children in the survey associated positive qualities exclusively with photographs of white children or adults. More than half of the black children made the same associations.<br />
In contrast, people with darker faces were viewed as troublemakers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/dress-witches-in-pink-and-avoid-white-paper-to-prevent-racism-in-nuseries-expert-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>School places shortage leave children facing being taught in &#8216;split shifts&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-places-shortage-leave-children-facing-being-taught-in-split-shifts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-places-shortage-leave-children-facing-being-taught-in-split-shifts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parentsoutloud.com/?p=2311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Children may be taught in "split shifts" at primary schools because of a critical shortage of places sparked by immigration and a rocketing birth rate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/school_children_1112974c.jpg"><img src="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/school_children_1112974c-150x150.jpg" alt="" title="school_children_1112974c" width="150" height="150" class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-2312" /></a>By Julie Henry and Tom Hadfield Sunday Telegraph<br />
16 Oct 2011<br />
Children may be taught in &#8220;split shifts&#8221; at primary schools because of a critical shortage of places sparked by immigration and a rocketing birth rate.<br />
As rising birth rates and immigration puts pressure on the school system, 540,000 additional primary school places nationally will be required by 2018 Photo: PA<br />
In a growing crisis across the country one authority is considering &#8220;time phased working for some schools&#8221;, which would see one group of pupils going to school in the morning and another in the afternoon.<br />
Official are also speaking to private landlords to convert a former MFI building and shops into make-shift classrooms.<br />
Emergency plans to provide thousands of extra primary places from next summer in Bristol, Bradford, Gloucester, Dorset, Reading, Salford, Hertfordshire, Stoke, Devon and a series of London boroughs are being drawn up.<br />
As rising birth rates and immigration puts pressure on the school system, 540,000 additional places nationally will be required by 2018. The official figures are based on a projected increase in primary pupils of 14 per cent from 3.96 million to 4.5 million The rise is steepest in London, where the population of five to 10-year-olds will rise by about 16%. In the rest of the country, it will grow by about 12%.<br />
Worried parents, who are applying now for places in September 2012, blame the crisis on town hall officials for failing to plan ahead. </p>
<blockquote><p>Margaret Morrissey, spokeswoman for the campaign group Parents Outloud, said: &#8220;If we are to continue to see population growth, either through a rising birth rate or through taking more immigrants, councils must ensure that new schools are written in to their plans.<br />
&#8220;It is no good saying there are a few places at poor schools miles across countryside or cities. Parents want and have a right to a place at a good local school.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Councils claim that migrant populations are difficult to predict and that plans to provide new schools have been badly affected by the Coalition&#8217;s decision to scrap Labour&#8217;s £7 billion scheme to rebuild 8,000 primaries.<br />
In Barking and Dagenham the birth rate has risen by 58 per cent in the last ten years.<br />
A minimum of 305 more reception class places are needed next year to ensure all 3,758 four year-olds in the borough find a school. Secondary school places are also needed from next year and until the end of the decade.<br />
The council has drawn up a plan to split schools between the morning and afternoon &#8211; which is entirely legal.<br />
&#8220;We are making a case directly to the Treasury, but as a last resort, we will consider operating &#8216;split shifts&#8217;,&#8221; a council spokesman said.<br />
&#8220;Using empty MFI stores for schools is not ideal, but we have a responsibility to school our children.&#8221;<br />
In other parts of the country, measures to deal with places shortages include adding &#8220;bulge&#8221; classes to existing schools, erecting Portacabins in the grounds of schools, driving up school rolls and creating so-called &#8220;Titan primaries&#8221; with upwards of 500 pupils, and even lobbying for increasing class sizes beyond the legal limit of 30.<br />
Several local authorities are already transporting children by taxi to schools several miles away.<br />
Ten children from Portishead in North Somerset who failed to get places at their local school go by taxi to schools in another town, at a cost of more than £700 a week. Green Meadow a private school in Lowton, Wigan, offered to give places to local children at the same price as the amount of cash given to councils for each pupil when parents were struggling to get in to local schools. Wigan Council rejected the offer even though local authorities are allow to use public funds to buy private school places and many do to cater for special needs pupils.<br />
Plans at some local authorities are on hold as they wait to find out if they have a share of a £500 million pot announced by the government in the summer to help local authorities provide extra school places.<br />
A Department for Education spokesman said: &#8220;We know that many schools across the country face real concerns about how to provide every child with a school place. We are investing £500 million to meet pressures caused by increased birth rates.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-places-shortage-leave-children-facing-being-taught-in-split-shifts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

