Sacked for exposing the bullies:
Sarah Harris Mail.
A school dinner lady who told the parents of a seven-year-old girl that she had been viciously bullied in the playground has been sacked. Scott and Claire David were simply informed in a letter home that their daughter Chloe had been ‘hurt’ in an incident with a skipping rope. In fact, she had been tied to a fence, whipped by four boys, had to be dragged to safety and suffered burns to her wrists. But the attempted cover-up was exposed when Carol Hill – the dinner lady who saved her from further injury – bumped into Mr and Mrs David and told them what really happened. Mrs Hill, 60, was suspended after the incident in June and yesterday it emerged that she has been fired by a disciplinary tribunal for breaching pupil confidentiality at Great Tey Primary School, near Colchester, Essex. The decision has been condemned by the girl’s family, who were prevented from giving evidence on Mrs Hill’s behalf. Other parents at the school are considering withdrawing their children in protest. Friends say that Mrs Hill, from Great Tey, who has worked at the school for almost eight years, is ‘shocked and very disappointed’ but is planning to appeal. One said: ‘She thinks she’s been treated really shabbily but she insists that if she saw a child being bullied again she would definitely step in like she did.’ Her husband, Ron, said: ‘She’s not been eating and has been really down. I can’t describe how cross I am. I can’t believe it’s got this far. She’s done nothing wrong.’ Mrs Hill has previously told how another pupil alerted her to the bullying incident. She found Chloe bound up and terrified. She said: ‘She had eight knots around her wrists and had been whipped across the legs with a skipping rope. I took her back into the school, along with four boys who had been seen with her. Two admitted it.’ Mr and Mrs David say Chloe, who had rope burns to her wrists and whip marks on her legs, was sent home with an accident notification letter. They could not find out what exactly had happened as she was in shock and refused to talk about it. Later that evening, Mrs Hill was helping at a Beaver Scouts meeting and went over to Mrs David to say she was sorry about what happened. Speaking in July, she said: ‘As I was talking to her it became clear she did not know the whole story. I had to tell her because she then realised there was more to it.’ Mr and Mrs David have since withdrawn Chloe and their five-year-old son, Cameron, from the school. They say that if Mrs Hill had not told them, they would never have been alerted to what had really happened. They later demanded to see the school’s accident book which stated that Chloe had been tied up. Mr David, 33, a steel worker, said last night: ‘I’m disgusted and shocked that Mrs Hill has been sacked and I’m disgusted that the school has been able to cover everything up. ‘It was her job to make sure that children’s welfare was being looked after. That’s what she did but she’s now being punished for doing her job properly. We back Mrs Hill totally. She did not realise we did not know all the facts. We should have done – we should have been called into the school.’ He added: ‘Chloe seems to be doing OK now. She seems to have bounced back better than us. We’re still trying to cope with what happened.’ Many parents are backing the dinner lady and want her to be reinstated. Sue Dyer and her husband Ivan, 50, a horticultural engineer, have five children at Great Tey Primary School. Mrs Dyer said: ‘The way Carol’s been treated is totally unjust. I would put total trust in her ability to look after my children. ‘Carol is 100 per cent for children, she is a very popular figure in the village and the school. ‘The children think Carol’s coming back – they keep asking, when is Mrs Hall back?’ Mrs Dyer said that if the headteacher had informed Chloe’s parents about the full extent of the bullying in the first instance, the trouble would have been avoided. Margaret Morrissey, of family campaign group Parents Outloud, said: ‘I’m absolutely sure she was just trying to act in the best interests of the child. ‘I doubt if there’s anyone who knew what had happened who wouldn’t want to sympathise. I’m sure that parents will be very upset to hear that she’s lost her job over it.’ Headmistress Debbie Crabb has insisted that Chloe’s parents were told of the incident according to school ‘accident and first aid procedures’. But she said the procedures would be reviewed. She said yesterday: ‘We can confirm that subject to any appeal Mrs Hill will not be returning to work at Great Tey Primary School.’



Hi
I’ve never commented here before but want to strongly support the Dinner lady who told the parents what happened to their child. My daughter is grown up now but was badly bullied at school which affected both her educationa nd her mental well-being for many years – I was told NOTHING by the school and of course she was too afraid of what the ofther children would do to her to tell me about it.
Bullying really MUST be taken more seriously and dealt with by schools.
it is disgusting that they tried to hide the incident under the school ‘accident and first aid procedures’. It sounds like the wrong one has been sacked to me ! Having also been the victim of bullying and the school trying to hide the issue rather than dealing with it I can see that the schools have not learnt.
The question is, who is the school protecting? the pupil? or itself? A breach of confidentiality would occur if the dinner lady had discussed the incident with a third party, however, she discussed the abuse with the parents, this is a duty of care, not a breach of confidentiality. The school has chosen to interpret her behaviour as a breach of confidentiality as an excuse for the fact that she exposed their attempt to cover up the incident. Shameful. The head teacher should be dismissed.
If this incident had happened to a grown-up the police may well have been brought in and charges of assault considered. Yet, one of the institutions that is supposed to safeguard the most vulnerable in our society seems to have tried to cover up the seriousness of an incident instead of giving a full and honest account to the parents – who after all have ultimate responsibility for their child. The one person who was open and caring has been fired presumably for causing the school to lose face. What does this say about our school system? I am a home educator who is constantly faced with the choice of sending my child to school or continuing the task myself. When things like this occur, is it any surprise that a growing minority are deciding not to delegate the responsibility of looking after and educating their children to institutions which do not seem to be fully accountable to us as parents.
Many schools and teachers ignore bullying.It took a new headteacher at my public school 5 years to stamp out institutional bullying. I was lucky the worst had gone!
Unfortunately the dust seems to have settled on this dreadful abuse of power.
I cannot find out how Mrs Hill is faring or if she is able to fight for justice. Is there a pressure group? I sincerely hope so…
The ‘socialists’ have taken on 600,000 new employees most of whome are not needed, badly managed or useless. They are also difficult to sack and always get a pension.
As the UK becomes poorer I hope that the government will shrivel up and we will, once again, become self reliant – just like the marvellous Mrs Hill. It’s time for normal people to become more assertive and support each other.
All bullies are weak, self serving and cowardly – and that includes the school staff, the education authority, the lawyers and the lawmakers.
Leave your response!
Most Commented
Most Viewed
Bad Behavior has blocked 1097 access attempts in the last 7 days.
Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Jubel