<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: School Packed Lunches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-packed-lunches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-packed-lunches/</link>
	<description>Helping provide a voice for Parents</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric the fish</title>
		<link>http://www.parentsoutloud.com/school-packed-lunches/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>eric the fish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parentsoutloud.wireless18.com/?p=41#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Hello Margaret. On what basis can Parents Outloud be described - in the words of The Daily Mail today - as a lobby group when it just seems to be you and 17 posts in 9 months on a blog?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Therefore, I would, if I may, ask you some questions:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;1.How many members do you have?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;2. Is membership open to all parents?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;3. Is membership open to all with an interest in UK education?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;4. Do you have any connections with any religious group or body?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;5. Would you rather take the approach of Sarah Palin and leave sex education to the playground?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;6. Do you have any links to any political party?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The reason for my concern is that The Mail, inter alia, has a worrying tendency to quote unelected groups such as Migratiowatch, Taxpayers&#039; Alliance, Civitas, without explaining their locus standi on matters, and whether they have any axe to grind. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You will recall the mistakes made by the media when quoting Mary Whitehouse&#039;s latest thoughts as fresh from Mount Sinai.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I look forward to hearing from you.&lt;br/&gt;Regards,&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Eric The Fish&lt;br/&gt;on behalf of nobody else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Margaret. On what basis can Parents Outloud be described &#8211; in the words of The Daily Mail today &#8211; as a lobby group when it just seems to be you and 17 posts in 9 months on a blog?</p>
<p>Therefore, I would, if I may, ask you some questions:</p>
<p>1.How many members do you have?</p>
<p>2. Is membership open to all parents?</p>
<p>3. Is membership open to all with an interest in UK education?</p>
<p>4. Do you have any connections with any religious group or body?</p>
<p>5. Would you rather take the approach of Sarah Palin and leave sex education to the playground?</p>
<p>6. Do you have any links to any political party?</p>
<p>The reason for my concern is that The Mail, inter alia, has a worrying tendency to quote unelected groups such as Migratiowatch, Taxpayers&#8217; Alliance, Civitas, without explaining their locus standi on matters, and whether they have any axe to grind. </p>
<p>You will recall the mistakes made by the media when quoting Mary Whitehouse&#8217;s latest thoughts as fresh from Mount Sinai.  </p>
<p>I look forward to hearing from you.<br />Regards,</p>
<p>Eric The Fish<br />on behalf of nobody else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

